Comments on: Why A Dynamic URL Structure Is Bad For SEO http://www.designandpromote.com/why-a-dynamic-url-structure-is-bad-for-seo/ Naperville Web Design and SEO Sun, 18 Dec 2011 19:48:37 +0000 hourly 1 By: Greg http://www.designandpromote.com/why-a-dynamic-url-structure-is-bad-for-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-369 Greg Thu, 04 Nov 2010 10:20:15 +0000 http://www.designandpromote.com/?p=862#comment-369 If you have dynamic URL's but the URL's don't change per page and they do contain keywords (but also numbers) - is there still a strong recommendation to change to static URL's? Does this depend on the trade off between having URL's re-directed using 301 re-directs (lower link juice?) and improving natural search rankings? If you have dynamic URL’s but the URL’s don’t change per page and they do contain keywords (but also numbers) – is there still a strong recommendation to change to static URL’s?

Does this depend on the trade off between having URL’s re-directed using 301 re-directs (lower link juice?) and improving natural search rankings?

]]> By: CyberChimps http://www.designandpromote.com/why-a-dynamic-url-structure-is-bad-for-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-234 CyberChimps Fri, 06 Aug 2010 03:57:05 +0000 http://www.designandpromote.com/?p=862#comment-234 I've found static url structures are a lot better for SEO as well. Back in the day I had a blog that was using dynamic urls and then when I switched to a static url structure I noticed an uptick in search engine traffic. I’ve found static url structures are a lot better for SEO as well. Back in the day I had a blog that was using dynamic urls and then when I switched to a static url structure I noticed an uptick in search engine traffic.

]]>